• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Maemura & Co. CPA’s LLP

Maemura & Co. CPA’s LLP

  • About Us
    • Our Values & Mission
    • Meet Our People
  • Our Services
    • International
    • Corporate
    • Tax Controversy
    • Business Restructuring
    • Assurance
    • Consulting
  • Industries
    • Automotive Technology
    • Biotechnology
    • Real Estate
    • Sports and Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Vineyard and Wine
  • Trends & Insights
  • Resources
    • Client Portal
    • Internet Links
Contact Us
July 10, 2023

Managing tax audits using sampling techniques

Sampling is a tool that is generally used whenever there is a list of records, also known as the population, that requires an assessment in order for the taxpayer to categorize the costs in a correct manner. Taxpayers use sampling to estimate the total amount of taxable transactions, meals deductions, expenditures qualifying for the Sec. 41 research credit (R&D credit), and several other applications.

The IRS and state taxing authorities typically use sampling to audit taxpayer determinations and estimate adjustments to amounts reported on tax returns. Sampling can produce efficiencies by reducing the volume of work and time required to make the necessary determinations required for tax filings or audits of tax fillings.

The two types of sampling: Statistical and judgmental

The two types of sampling used across tax audits are statistical (random) sampling and judgmental (nonrandom) sampling.

A statistical sample gives each record in the population a known, nonzero chance of selection. This allows for an unbiased sample selection and an unbiased representation of the population. Moreover, the examiner can make mathematically defensible conclusions about the population and the accuracy of the estimates.

A judgmental (nonrandom) sample is based entirely on the examiner’s judgment. For example, the examiner may pick the sample based on prior research and knowledge of problematic areas. While this can be efficient for finding issues, it causes gross bias when extrapolating sample results to make conclusions about the population. Even when the examiner attempts to select the sample haphazardly in an effort to judgmentally choose a random assortment, there is a human tendency to select a sample that is not representative of the population, and therefore judgmental samples risk a skewed calculation of adjustments, disallowed amounts, or even penalties and fines.

by Hamid Ashtiani and Wendy Rotz, PStat
https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/2023/jul/managing-tax-audits-using-sampling-techniques.html#:~:text=Sampling%20can%20produce%20efficiencies%20by,or%20audits%20of%20tax%20fillings.&text=The%20two%20types%20of%20sampling%20used%20across%20tax%20audits%20are,and%20judgmental%20(nonrandom)%20sampling

Footer

177 Bovet Road, Suite 545
San Mateo, CA 94402-3121
Telephone: (650) 358-2190
Fax: (650) 358-2191
Email: info@maemura.com

About Us

  • Our Values & Mission
  • Meet Our People

Services

  • International
  • Corporate
  • Tax Controversy
  • Business Restructuring
  • Assurance
  • Consulting

Industries

  • Automotive Technology
  • Biotechnology
  • Real Estate
  • Sports and Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Vineyard and Wine

Contact Us

  • Contact
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2023 Maemura & Co. CPA’s LLP. All rights reserved. Website by Bay Area Web Design